Skip to main content
iconsEvidence for Learning logoEvidence for Learning logoiconsSocial Ventures Australia logoBuildShareUseTwitter
Evidence for Learning
  • About
  • The Toolkits
  • Research and Evaluation
  • Guidance Reports
  • Evidence Informed Educators
  1. Home
  2. The Toolkits
  3. All Approaches - Full Toolkit
  4. Teaching assistants

Teaching assistants – References

Low impact, high cost, based on limited evidence

Average cost
Evidence security
Months' impact
+ 1 months

In some cases teachers and TAs work together effectively, leading to increases in achievement.

Definition

Teaching assistants (also known as TAs or classroom support assistants) are adults who support teachers in the classroom. Teaching assistants’ duties can vary widely from school to school, ranging from providing administrative and classroom support to providing targeted academic support to individual students or small groups.

Search terms: support staff; adult support staff; teaching assistants; associate staff; classroom assistants; auxiliary teachers; teachers’ aide; education paraprofessional

Evidence Rating

A number of systematic reviews of the impact of support staff in schools have been conducted. However, there are no meta-analyses specifically looking at the impact of TAs on learning. Overall the evidence is limited.

Contents

Print this page

References
  1. Alborz, A., Pearson, D., Farrell, P., Howes, A.
    The impact of adult support staff on pupils and mainstream schools
    Technical Report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
    (2009)
  2. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Koutsoubou, M., Martin, C., Russell, A. and Webster, R., with Rubie-Davies, C.
    The impact of support staff in schools. Results from the Deployment and Impact of Support Staff project. (Strand 2 Wave 2) (DCSF-RR148)
    London: Department for Children, Schools and Families
    (2009)
  3. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R.
    The impact of support staff on pupils’ ‘positive approaches to learning’ and their academic progress
    British Educational Research Journal,37(3), 443-464
    (2011)
  4. Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C.
    The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil–Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project
    British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 5-26
    (2007)
  5. Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J., & Hulme, C.
    Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422-432
    (2008)
  6. Brown, K. J., Morris, D., & Fields, M.
    Intervention after grade 1: Serving increased numbers of struggling readers effectively
    Journal of Literacy Research, 37(1), 61-94
    (2005)
  7. Burgoyne, K., Duff, F. J., Clarke, P. J., Buckley, S., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C.
    Efficacy of a reading and language intervention for children with Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(10), 1044-1053
    (2012)
  8. Butt, R. and Lowe, K.
    Teaching assistants and class teachers: differing perceptions, role confusion and the benefits of skills-based training
    International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 207–219
    (2012)
  9. Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Bowyer-Crane, C., Hulme, C., Smith, G., Gibbs, S., & Snowling, M. J.
    Reading with vocabulary intervention: Evaluation of an instruction for children with poor response to reading intervention
    Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 319-336
    (2008)
  10. Ehri, L. C., Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A..
    Reading Rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade
    American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 414-448
    (2007)
  11. Farrell, P., Alborz, A., Howes, A. & Pearson, D.
    The impact of teaching assistants on improving pupils' academic achievement in mainstream schools: a review of the literature
    Educational Review, 62.4 pp 435-448
    (2010)
  12. Gerber, S.B., Finn, J.D., Achilles, C.M. and Boyd-Zacharias, J.
    Teacher aides and students’ academic achievement
    Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23.2 pp 123-143
    (2001)
  13. Gorard, S., See, B. H., Siddiqui, N.
    Switch-on Reading Evaluation Report and Executive Summary
    EEF, London
    (2014)
  14. Gray, C., McCloy, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J., Mitchell, D., & Ferguson, J.
    Added value or a familiar face? The impact of learning support assistants on young readers
    Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5(3), 285-300
    (2007)
  15. Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G.
    Evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support programme
    British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 351-367
    (2006)
  16. Mecrow, C., Beckwith, J., & Klee, T.
    An exploratory trial of the effectiveness of an enhanced consultative approach to delivering speech and language intervention in schools
    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(3), 354-367
    (2010)
  17. Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B.
    Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities
    Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 179-189
    (2000)
  18. Miller, S. D.
    Partners-in-reading: Using classroom assistants to provide tutorial assistance to struggling first-grade readers
    Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 8(3), 333-349
    (2003)
  19. Moore, W. and Hammond, L.
    Using education assistants to help pave the road to literacy: Supporting oral language, letter-sound knowledge and phonemic awareness in the pre-primary year
    Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(2), 85–110
    (2011)
  20. Morris, D.
    Using Noncertified Tutors to Work with At Risk Readers: An Evidence-Based Model
    The Elementary School Journal, 106(4), 351-362
    (2006)
  21. Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D.
    The effectiveness of the use of learning support assistants in improving the mathematics achievement of low achieving pupils in primary school
    Educational Research, 45.3 pp 219-230
    (2003)
  22. NFER
    A Randomised Trial of Catch Up Numeracy® Evaluation Report and Executive Summary
    EEF, London
    (2014)
  23. Ritter, G.W., Barnett, J.H., Genny, C.S., & Albin, G.R.
    The Effectiveness of Volunteer Tutoring Programs for Elementary and Middle School Students: A Meta-Analysis
    Review of Educational Research, 79 (3), 3-38
    (2009)
  24. Savage, R., & Carless, S.
    The impact of early reading interventions delivered by classroom assistants on attainment at the end of Year 2
    British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 363-385. (Follow up of 2003 study)
    (2008)
  25. Savage, R., Carless, S., & Stuart, M.
    The effects of rime and phoneme-based teaching delivered by learning support assistants
    Journal of Research in Reading, 26(3), 211-233
    (2003)
  26. Swann, W., & Loxley, A.
    The impact of school‐based training on classroom assistants in primary schools
    Research papers in education, 13(2), 141-160
    (1998)
  27. Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A.
    Repeated reading intervention: Outcomes and interactions with readers' skills and classroom instruction
    Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 272
    (2008)
  28. Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Tudor, S.
    Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction beyond basic decoding skills
    Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 508-525
    (2007)



Summary of effects

Single studies Effect size FSM effect size Measure*
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Koutsoubou, M., Martin, C., Russell, A. and Webster, R., with Rubie-Davies, C. (2009)
0.00 -
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2011)
-0.01 -
Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007)
0.00 -
Brown, K. J., Morris, D., & Fields, M. (2005)
1.18 -
Ehri, L. C., Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A.. (2007)
0.74 -
Gerber, S.B., Finn, J.D., Achilles, C.M. and Boyd-Zacharias, J. (2001)
0.00 - (compared with regular classes)
-0.15 - (compared with small classes)
Gray, C., McCloy, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J., Mitchell, D., & Ferguson, J. (2007)
0.00 -
Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G. (2006)
0.15 -
Mecrow, C., Beckwith, J., & Klee, T. (2010)
0.12 -
Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000)
1.50 -
Moore, W. and Hammond, L. (2011)
0.79 -
Morris, D. (2006)
0.76 -
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2003)
0.00 -
Savage, R., Carless, S., & Stuart, M. (2003)
0.37 -
Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Tudor, S. (2007)
0.22 -
Effect size (indicative) 0.08

* The right hand column provides detail on the specific outcome measures or, if in brackets, details of the intervention or control group.

For more information about the effect sizes in the Toolkit, click here.

Connect with us

Subscribe to our newsletter for updates

Sign up to the Evidence for Learning e-news to receive updates on evidence-informed practice taking place in Australia and internationally.


Follow us on

Twitter Facebook Youtube

Evidence for Learning is supported by

social ventures australia commonwealth bank education endowment foundation
  • About
  • The Toolkits
  • Research and Evaluation
  • Guidance Reports
  • Evidence Informed Educators
  • COVID-19 home-supported learning
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Privacy